<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Non-standard image/pjpeg mimetype on IE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zigpress.com/2010/01/14/non-standard-imagepjpeg-mimetype-on-ie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zigpress.com/2010/01/14/non-standard-imagepjpeg-mimetype-on-ie/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=non-standard-imagepjpeg-mimetype-on-ie</link>
	<description>Web Design Malta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:41:30 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.zigpress.com/2010/01/14/non-standard-imagepjpeg-mimetype-on-ie/#comment-4709</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zigpress.com/?p=616#comment-4709</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Lilly Bell on this. Although Internet Explorer may have run into a few problems over the last several years, MS have really started to get their act together recently, especially starting with v8.0 onwards. I think the overall user experience has improved significantly.

Finally we should remember that even Firefox is not without its own problems (the memory leak and other issues took them a fair amount of time to sort out.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Lilly Bell on this. Although Internet Explorer may have run into a few problems over the last several years, MS have really started to get their act together recently, especially starting with v8.0 onwards. I think the overall user experience has improved significantly.</p>
<p>Finally we should remember that even Firefox is not without its own problems (the memory leak and other issues took them a fair amount of time to sort out.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marry @ A1C levels</title>
		<link>http://www.zigpress.com/2010/01/14/non-standard-imagepjpeg-mimetype-on-ie/#comment-4414</link>
		<dc:creator>Marry @ A1C levels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 17:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zigpress.com/?p=616#comment-4414</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a webdesigner and one of the most frustrating things is to do different versions of css for IE7, IE8, IE9 (thank god IE6 is no longer in the picture). The above example is just another example of this horrific thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a webdesigner and one of the most frustrating things is to do different versions of css for IE7, IE8, IE9 (thank god IE6 is no longer in the picture). The above example is just another example of this horrific thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TaoLiu</title>
		<link>http://www.zigpress.com/2010/01/14/non-standard-imagepjpeg-mimetype-on-ie/#comment-4322</link>
		<dc:creator>TaoLiu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 06:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zigpress.com/?p=616#comment-4322</guid>
		<description>Hi Tony, yes it’s about accepting and processing uploads from browser forms. They all send image/jpeg except IE. As for IE6, it’s quite happy dealing with PNG files, it just won’t do alpha transparency properly. So I say to IE6 users: tough, upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tony, yes it’s about accepting and processing uploads from browser forms. They all send image/jpeg except IE. As for IE6, it’s quite happy dealing with PNG files, it just won’t do alpha transparency properly. So I say to IE6 users: tough, upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Video Games Mentor</title>
		<link>http://www.zigpress.com/2010/01/14/non-standard-imagepjpeg-mimetype-on-ie/#comment-4235</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Video Games Mentor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zigpress.com/?p=616#comment-4235</guid>
		<description>I still can&#039;t believe anyone in their right mind is using IE. I stopped coding for it 2 years ago. Just got tired of writing two versions of websites...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still can&#8217;t believe anyone in their right mind is using IE. I stopped coding for it 2 years ago. Just got tired of writing two versions of websites&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Image pjpeg &#124; ZukOnline</title>
		<link>http://www.zigpress.com/2010/01/14/non-standard-imagepjpeg-mimetype-on-ie/#comment-3769</link>
		<dc:creator>Image pjpeg &#124; ZukOnline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zigpress.com/?p=616#comment-3769</guid>
		<description>[...] Non-standard image/pjpeg mimetype on IE &#8211; ZigPressHere&#039;s a lovely little Internet Explorer feature that may have web developers cursing, so I figured I would write a brief post about it in &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Non-standard image/pjpeg mimetype on IE &#8211; ZigPressHere&#039;s a lovely little Internet Explorer feature that may have web developers cursing, so I figured I would write a brief post about it in &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UK Business Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.zigpress.com/2010/01/14/non-standard-imagepjpeg-mimetype-on-ie/#comment-3288</link>
		<dc:creator>UK Business Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zigpress.com/?p=616#comment-3288</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Daniel, Mozilla Firefox is much much superior for web developers, just take SEO Quake Toolbar for example. Functionality is much better with Firefox and much faster than IE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Daniel, Mozilla Firefox is much much superior for web developers, just take SEO Quake Toolbar for example. Functionality is much better with Firefox and much faster than IE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: South African Game Reserve</title>
		<link>http://www.zigpress.com/2010/01/14/non-standard-imagepjpeg-mimetype-on-ie/#comment-3144</link>
		<dc:creator>South African Game Reserve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 09:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zigpress.com/?p=616#comment-3144</guid>
		<description>Great Work… :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Work… <img src='http://www.zigpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Saeper</title>
		<link>http://www.zigpress.com/2010/01/14/non-standard-imagepjpeg-mimetype-on-ie/#comment-1120</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Saeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 02:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zigpress.com/?p=616#comment-1120</guid>
		<description>Back when Internet Explorer was first created it was top of the line, but the truth is all that has changed.  There&#039;s so many better browsers available, especially Mozilla Firefox of course.  

Even browsers like Flock &amp; Google Chrome seem to have more options, are easier to use, are more secure &amp; just overall a much better browser than IE.  Looks like microsoft better come up with something quick or their browser&#039;s going to be run out of the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back when Internet Explorer was first created it was top of the line, but the truth is all that has changed.  There&#8217;s so many better browsers available, especially Mozilla Firefox of course.  </p>
<p>Even browsers like Flock &amp; Google Chrome seem to have more options, are easier to use, are more secure &amp; just overall a much better browser than IE.  Looks like microsoft better come up with something quick or their browser&#8217;s going to be run out of the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilly Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.zigpress.com/2010/01/14/non-standard-imagepjpeg-mimetype-on-ie/#comment-1066</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilly Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zigpress.com/?p=616#comment-1066</guid>
		<description>Internet Explorer 8 is very good because it is as stable as Opera. I hate the previous versions of IE like IE6 because it hangs frequently.      &#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Internet Explorer 8 is very good because it is as stable as Opera. I hate the previous versions of IE like IE6 because it hangs frequently.      &#8216;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrZen</title>
		<link>http://www.zigpress.com/2010/01/14/non-standard-imagepjpeg-mimetype-on-ie/#comment-1064</link>
		<dc:creator>MrZen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zigpress.com/?p=616#comment-1064</guid>
		<description>A link from microsoft:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms775147%28VS.85%29.aspx#_replace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A link from microsoft:<br />
<a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms775147%28VS.85%29.aspx#_replace" rel="nofollow">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms775147%28VS.85%29.aspx#_replace</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

